[153474] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: LinkedIn password database compromised
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jeff murphy)
Thu Jun 7 10:07:55 2012
From: jeff murphy <jcmurphy@jeffmurphy.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 10:06:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20120607135801.GA24269@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
To: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jun 7, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:14:58PM -0700, Aaron =
C. de Bruyn wrote:
>> Heck no to X.509. We'd run into the same issue we have right now--a
>> select group of companies charging users to prove their identity.
>=20
...
> For instance, I'm not at all opposed to the idea of the
> government having a way to issue me a signed certificate that I
> then use to access government services, like submitting my tax
> return online, renewing my drivers license, or maybe even e-voting.
All in favor of paying $119/year to vote, please raise your hands.
http://www.verisign.com/dod-interoperability/
