|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGXuoMAJ-crr7roi-Kk6EdMcHxcA43poaOJTxLefHmg+Gw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:37:12 -0700 From: Mark Boolootian <booloo@ucsc.edu> To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org Sure, but with the neighbor discovery cache issues that come up with > /64's under attack, why open yourself to trouble where you can't > realize any benefit? > I happen to be a fan of /126s, but if you chose to use a /64, presumably your infrastructure ACLs would provide protection against such attacks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |