[153286] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Brunner-Williams)
Mon Jun 4 16:22:12 2012
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:21:08 -0400
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20120604192809.GL614@dyn.com>
Reply-To: ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 6/4/12 3:28 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Well, I note that at least the .secure promoters haven't decided it's
> a good idea:
the _known_ .secure-and-all-confusingly-similar-labels promoters.
the reveal is weeks away, followed by the joys of contention set
formation.
there may be more than one .secure application, and who knows, perhaps
a .sec in the bag, or a .cure, or a .seeker, or .sequre, or ...
however, yeah, the requirement bites at contract / delegation time, so
about a year in the future.
-e
