[153279] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: bgp best practice question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Grundemann)
Mon Jun 4 14:55:55 2012
In-Reply-To: <8E5EF620-F0CF-4288-9179-74D26AC5896F@smugmug.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:55:01 -0600
From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann@gmail.com>
To: jon Heise <jon@smugmug.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Depends on a few things, but the main questions are probably:
Are the data-centers connected on the backside (VPN, etc. - could the
new dc failover through the main dc)?
Yes - /22
Will that /24 ever be used in the main datacenter?
Yes - /22
$0.02
~Chris
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:36 PM, jon Heise <jon@smugmug.com> wrote:
> I need to make one of our data centers internet accessible, i plan to adv=
ertise a /24 out of our existing /22 network block at our new site. My ques=
tion is for our main datacenter, is it a better idea to continue to adverti=
se the full /22 or advertise the remaining /23 and /24 networks ?
>
> - Jon Heise
--=20
@ChrisGrundemann
http://chrisgrundemann.com
