[153239] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Questions about anycasting setup
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Woodcock)
Sun Jun 3 17:12:38 2012
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0+aXYJ9EehVDrku08__rKEdTJGPC-4feriT4ycALNHuB13dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 14:11:49 -0700
To: Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> I tried doing anycasting with 3 nodes, and seems like it didn't worked =
well
> at all. It seems like ISPs prefer their own or their customer route =
(which
> is our transit provider) and there is almost no "short/local route" =
effect.
Correct. That's why you need to use the same transit providers at each =
location.
=
http://www.pch.net/resources/papers//dns-service-architecture/dns-service-=
architecture-v11.pdf
Slides 20-29.
-Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org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=3DD+uQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
