[153200] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Comcast IPv6 Update
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brzozowski, John)
Fri Jun 1 10:06:43 2012
From: "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>, Jimmy Sadri <jimmys@myesn.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:05:47 +0000
In-Reply-To: <A866687A-54EE-49FA-92E4-4FEA0AC760C2@puck.nether.net>
Cc: 'NANOG' <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Commercial DOCSIS is later this year.
Commercial fiber can be supported now.
John
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast Cable
m) +1-609-377-6594
e) mailto:john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com
o) +1-484-962-0060
w) http://www.comcast6.net
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
-----Original Message-----
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Date: Friday, June 1, 2012 9:56 AM
To: Jimmy Sadri <jimmys@myesn.com>
Cc: Jason Livingood <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>, "'Blake T.
Pfankuch'" <blake@pfankuch.me>, John Jason Brzozowski
<john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Update
>My understanding is that Comcast only does IPv6 on business customers
>that are on their "backbone" network, not those on their docsis network.
>
>If you have BGP or fiber with 7922 you should be able to get IPv6.
>
>- Jared
>
>On Jun 1, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Jimmy Sadri wrote:
>
>> Wow... I just wanted some info on deployment scheduling and possilbe
>> timelines for getting Ipv6 and I get all that. Gotta say they could
>>really
>> do better in the customer service dept. I wonder if you guys have any
>>more
>> info on this or can at least point me in the right direction... like I
>> said I already tried Comcast Business Support with the above results...
>>so I
>> guess if you can help find out this before World Ipv6 day so that I
>> could participate that would be ideal... I wonder if anyone else has
>>tried
>> getting this info on the list with better results?
>
