[153194] in North American Network Operators' Group
Accuracy of RFCs (was: Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Fri Jun 1 07:47:18 2012
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see
http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse
reporting information)
From: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120601082800.GA19206@pob.ytti.fi>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 07:46:30 -0400
To: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jun 1, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> It's extremely hard to find RFC which does not contain incorrect
> information or practically undeployable data.
Actual errors in RFC's (typos, incorrect references, etc.) -
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php>
Differing views regarding RFC subject material; feel free to
work with others of similar to write up your perspective -
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2223.txt>
The RFC series is an Internet-wide community effort.
Thanks!
/John
