[153179] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rubens Kuhl)
Thu May 31 20:30:30 2012
In-Reply-To: <28606200.6922.1338509991586.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 21:29:49 -0300
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>
To: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jay Ashworth" <jra@baylink.com>
>
>> Subject: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD
>
> I see that LWN has already spotted this; smb will no doubt be pleased to
> know that the very first reply suggests that RFC 3514 solves the problem
> much more easily.
In the domain business we don't need a new RFC to know that everything
that is evil will end in .evil, and everything else is not evil. No
need to define a new bitmask field.
Rubens
