[152981] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Industry practice for BGP costs - one time or fixed/monthly?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jim deleskie)
Fri May 25 12:04:55 2012
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0+aXYRwZazh6kOD8abkHrZYfzpPqCFZTWddH-dGhTCHYBjjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 13:04:08 -0300
From: jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com>
To: Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
IMHO the only reason(s) would be to discourage people from asking for
it, or as a $$ grab.
-jim
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
>
> I have been aggressively looking for deals in servers in Europe for
> anycasting. One thing which surprises me is the "setup costs" for BGP. Few
> providers quoted additional $50-100 which looks OK but a few of them quoted
> as high as $150 *extra every month* just for having BGP (no full routing
> table, but just default route pointing). Is there's any technical logic
> behind such heavy costs? I mean at the end of day we are all talking at
> layer 3 and thus it does not involves any hard connection/physical work.
> What other members pay for BGP setup costs?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
>
> Anurag Bhatia
> anuragbhatia.com
> or simply - http://[2001:470:26:78f::5] if you are on IPv6 connected
> network!
>
> Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> |
> Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>|
> Google+ <https://plus.google.com/118280168625121532854>
