[152943] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISPs and full packet inspection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gabriel Blanchard)
Thu May 24 09:16:11 2012
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:15:25 -0400
From: Gabriel Blanchard <gabe@teksavvy.ca>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAKF9zbBoWQ8sqBZNThXaW0Vw6YjjMO80eg3E5O5=vHq35yv3xw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
might I suggest you consider replacing your legal team.
On 05/24/12 09:13, not common wrote:
> Thanks guys, I am looking for stuff to bring to my legal team (which is one
> guy, that can't spell IP) and VPs.
>
> There has to be some thing out there or is this really a hands of topic?
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:58 AM, -Hammer- <bhmccie@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You should be discussing this with inside counsel. Not NANOG.
>>
>> -Hammer-
>>
>> "I was a normal American nerd"
>> -Jack Herer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/24/2012 7:50 AM, not common wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am looking for some guidance on full packet inspection at the ISP level.
>>>
>>> Is there any regulations that prohibit or provide guidance on this?
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>
