[152907] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jamie Bowden)
Wed May 23 07:39:38 2012
From: Jamie Bowden <jamie@photon.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>, Randy Carpenter
<rcarpen@network1.net>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:36:09 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabc=cQdrQZt3DAeDwqx5f+eXTb9x8Gj=40V5wMQ3MRZhg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com]
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Randy Carpenter
> <rcarpen@network1.net> wrote:
> >
> > Not only does Verizon *not* have IPv6 on their LTE network, they also
> do *not* have IPv4, except for double-NATed rfc1918 crap that changes
> your IP address every couple minutes. The only way to get a stable
> connection is to pay them $500 to get a static public IP address.
> >
>=20
> wierd, I could swear someone in my office with a galaxy-nexus-on-vzw
> was able to browse some ipv6-only sites.
My Moto Droid RAZR is most definitely IPv6 over LTE.
Jamie
