[152882] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue May 22 22:13:31 2012
In-Reply-To: <d0478146-d36c-4711-a670-5f1f3ae00d65@zimbra.network1.net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:12:58 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net> wr=
ote:
>
> Not only does Verizon *not* have IPv6 on their LTE network, they also do =
*not* have IPv4, except for double-NATed rfc1918 crap that changes your IP =
address every couple minutes. The only way to get a stable connection is to=
pay them $500 to get a static public IP address.
>
wierd, I could swear someone in my office with a galaxy-nexus-on-vzw
was able to browse some ipv6-only sites.
