[152797] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: pbx recco
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Latham)
Wed May 16 08:43:18 2012
In-Reply-To: <4FB39FED.8000604@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:42:30 -0400
From: Andrew Latham <lathama@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Simon Perreault
<simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:
> On 2012-05-15 19:01, Tom Hill wrote:
>>
>> On 15/05/12 18:00, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>
>>> i run a raw asterisk and would not wish it on my worst enemy.
>>
>>
>> I've been itching to try Freeswitch
>
>
> I know FreeSWITCH and Asterisk from the inside out because we ported both=
of
> them to IPv6.
>
> Verdict:
>
> - Asterisk started ugly but is getting much better very quickly. They
> actually have paid professional coders working on it, and it shows. They
> started participating in the IETF. They recently implemented ICE. They're=
on
> the right track.
>
> - FreeSWITCH started much prettier by reusing third-party libraries. But =
the
> glue code around these libs is absolutely horrendous. That glue code keep=
s
> growing and getting uglier. Their level of clue is dropping.
>
> Right now, I'd pick Asterisk over FreeSWITCH.
>
> Simon
> --
> DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> NAT64/DNS64 open-source =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0--> http://ecdysis.via=
genie.ca
> STUN/TURN server =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 --> htt=
p://numb.viagenie.ca
>
Thanks Simon, I was about to say something. Users that have a hard
time with Asterisk do not understand it.
--=20
~ Andrew "lathama" Latham lathama@gmail.com http://lathama.net ~
