[152570] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: VoIP/Mobile Codecs (was Re: Operation Ghost Click)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen van Aart)
Wed May 2 19:40:31 2012
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 16:39:48 -0700
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <B9ACFA3F-EC1F-4F2E-B0AA-F2D0B539DF71@seanharlow.info>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Sean Harlow wrote:
> Originally, you said VoIP and cellular used bad codecs.
Yeah, I overlooked that important detail, sorry.
> The cellular world works with less bandwidth and more loss than the VoIP world usually deals with, so while us VoIP guys sometimes use their codecs (GSM for example) they don't tend to bother with ours.
Agreed.
> That said, the article you link is talking about the same sort of improvements by doubling the sampling rate, so the end result is similar.
Yes, but it shouldn't be necessary to offer these "HD" services as an
extra. It should be standard.
Greetings,
Jeroen
--
Earthquake Magnitude: 4.0
Date: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 12:33:29 UTC
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada region
Latitude: 50.6619; Longitude: -129.8861
Depth: 10.00 km
