[152559] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Operation Ghost Click
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Harlow)
Wed May 2 15:57:52 2012
From: Sean Harlow <sean@seanharlow.info>
In-Reply-To: <C262B52114110B4586FAF49F074F0580109897F1D6@mailserver2007.nyigc.globe>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 15:57:00 -0400
To: Eric Wieling <EWieling@nyigc.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Then you'll be happy to know that most VoIP phones default to and good =
VoIP providers gladly support G.711, the exact same codec used in all =
digital trunks in the POTS network. Also, an on-the-ball VoIP carrier =
will be pushing G.722 "HD Voice" devices which offer about double the =
audio bandwidth in the same data bandwidth (64kbit/sec/stream) as G.711.
If your carrier is forcing G.729 or GSM, they're a joke.
---
Sean Harlow
sean@seanharlow.info
On May 2, 2012, at 15:52, Eric Wieling wrote:
>=20
> I doubt the g729 or GSM codecs used by VoIP and Cell phones can =
compare to a POTS line.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com]=20
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 3:43 PM
> To: Jeroen van Aart
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: Operation Ghost Click
>=20
> wow, 1990 much? are you actually just trolling today perhaps?
>=20
>=20
