[152542] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jimmy Hess)
Tue May 1 20:07:04 2012
In-Reply-To: <90547F1A-5EC0-4500-8C74-AD9490E2BEC4@ianai.net>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 19:06:27 -0500
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 5/1/12, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net> wrote:
> I love the fact Dominik says "from a CDN", then leaves Limelight's name in
> the text. :)
[snip]
So a CDN made the mistake of attempting to monetize an existing
peering arrangement without first having a signed peering arrangement
in place for the existing peering with a Mutual NDA prohibiting any
dissemination details of any of their communications/ future
negotiations/etc of peering arrangement or traffic exchanged to
unrelated third parties??
The lack of a NDA that would prohibit identifying a CDN and their
e-mail notification of depeering, whether their name was mentioned or
not, sounds quite un-Tier1 like to me.
--
-JH
