[152532] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue May 1 17:27:43 2012
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 01 May 2012 17:16:38 -0400."
<A9F2D6BD-F6C2-4B6D-A122-4F039EEA93FF@ianai.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 17:24:23 -0400
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1335907463_1955P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 01 May 2012 17:16:38 -0400, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:
> P.S. Bill, it is clear you have a point, but you are really stretching
> it. And it is not relevant to the discussion at hand.
Oh, I dunno. Double billing 2 customers for development and double billing
2 customers for transporting packets seem related ;)
--==_Exmh_1335907463_1955P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iQIVAwUBT6BUhgdmEQWDXROgAQK+sRAAo5FRq2OCx5wr1rvQ04HkbyCXfONlEX55
YTrVGu20v4zn0iNArLXNwszXNnHYD1+HPkLt4tlOn05rpZd6ZpW7YZ+WD+3m5JAC
ubAuhLc4NeCFU34y77r0iFqHhSteOWRMBQs1r5ZaJtuEcVNtoWFTSe6PS0MOZhWK
pMa9x07ic1gHDJjXKCP7vrpgEeVWIekjxcvHD1BlnG41Mzh22whXNCp0ylNFgf3A
ho9m75Rb3Y60yJDC7zsSwJeiMGEuaa57nGxkJHXRmK9cVt0/yEIesK6bkbTYGWY8
rNssX00Ppb1dfWGMbrpLgf9Eq8QVc+frjmycDzrJASVsRbbYMDHjXCYgSlz6jCgU
eydc43M40umJIthkn/obyV+VIaTHzgzwcFKK8Pt+WsNtvDA+Yb6vHx1TR8KiuDuJ
N/lfdZeo96Lr9rgLmhUgOs3SSViC/4MHw+WuUY7dFtnEvkhWBbwA/BMtYjhlO8xK
FnOzbhORBjgYj4JrgbmsjjE9j1iOtrT9Hft/CYYMOVA/+0uXON1cMwMR0gwQyVol
HPTmirHPGRsZlohmMBd5SIyDEcMzWf832hPp/yusGffx+V9VLxNKPcdNB3ZqnJL0
epgI79SyVyzuAKjvMS05BA0gm71Ljv7sLTk+fWjDuhtq0E8UqGsom1+TkSbGmiLM
NU9SieKXR4w=
=sCKK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1335907463_1955P--
