[152530] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Tue May 1 17:17:11 2012
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAN3um4wfneZfw_+5xHtZJz+R-3-TA4fRx0s10gJ+ZGDy6k7RgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 17:16:38 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Let's keep our eye on the ball, people. Did the original post have any =
operational consequences?
IMHO, it has many. Some are even interesting to the wider audience. So =
why are we discussing how you bill the US gov't?
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
P.S. Bill, it is clear you have a point, but you are really stretching =
it. And it is not relevant to the discussion at hand.
On May 1, 2012, at 17:13 , Mike Hale wrote:
> "If one of the customers happens to be the U.S. Government, it's not
> only unethical it's a crime. It's usually a felony. You can do time.
> The product was man hours. You've sold them once. You can't sell them
> again."
> You're assuming the contract is simply for work hours. Generally
> speaking, and from my experience, it isn't. The contract is for an
> app that does X, not 20 hours toward building an app that does X.
[snip]=
