[152526] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Tue May 1 16:55:03 2012
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 13:54:05 -0700
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Mail-Followup-To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADUFW=XzX1_ELMFpgkTmj7EhwVjycAsar_2b+yxXtAnMQ9WE+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Tue, May 01, 2012 at 03:45:29PM -0500, Jerry Dent w=
rote:
> Can be for the end users if they wind up on a less direct network path.
"Direct" is not the only measure.
I would take a 4-hop, 10GE, no packet loss path over a 1-hop, 1GE,
5% packet loss path any day of the week.
"Shorter" {hops, latency, as-path} does not mean a higher quality end
user experience.
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)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=spU/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--
