[152487] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Tue May 1 12:11:39 2012
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <732FE83D-E76C-4FB1-B89D-1ECB17934E64@arbor.net>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 09:10:41 -0700
To: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Roland,
On May 1, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> On May 1, 2012, at 8:18 PM, David Conrad wrote:
>>> It's hard to take seriously any proposal which is predicated upon =
recursive dependencies.
>> Do you mean the need to be able to use [X] to fetch the data to =
enable you to use [X]?
> A lot more than just [X] is necessary in order to allow [X] =
transactions to work.
> ... - in this context, I'm specifically referring to routing.
So, you're saying that the entire RPKI+BGPSEC effort is hard for you to =
take seriously. OK.
Regards,
-drc
