[152456] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dmitry Burkov)
Mon Apr 30 11:56:28 2012
From: Dmitry Burkov <dburk@burkov.aha.ru>
In-Reply-To: <m27gwx5ikh.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:55:26 +0400
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Randy -
you know that I'm enough stupid- means straightforward -=20
may be the way is not only technical (recomendations design) - but also =
to combine with some policy changes as
splitting allocations and assignments (may be changing who is =
responsible for what?)
Or we follow the traditional way(means hierarchy) or we are capable to =
introduce one more=20
level for flexebility - we should be honest that all techinical design =
just follows some political or quasi-political decisions.
But I think it can be changed.
Dima
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:46 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> We need more flexible, distributed architecture behind - no matter -
>> which interests will be lobbied as we have got already.
>=20
> as i agree that there is a problem, i *very* eagerly await your =
proposal
>=20
> randy
