[152432] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper MX960 with SCB-E vs Cisco ASR9k with RSP400
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Apr 29 11:32:20 2012
To: Abdelkader Chikh Daho <achikhdaho@iweb.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:30:37 -0400."
<4F9D508D.6080509@iweb.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:31:17 -0400
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1335713477_31945P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:30:37 -0400, Abdelkader Chikh Daho said:
> I wan to ask for your feedback about these two devices : Juniper MX960
> with SCB-E and Cisco AS9k with RSP400.
They both work well in some situation, and totally fail in others. It would help
if you gave more detail what problem you're trying to solve. Also, are you sure
that *those two* devices are the only suitable ones for your application, or
do you want answers of "You may want to look at XYZ's model 915 as well"?
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html is probably the most
helpful answer I can give to your original query.
--==_Exmh_1335713477_31945P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iQIVAwUBT51exAdmEQWDXROgAQLBGQ/+LrN7FAhbnlLpds6cEBMROT/qyya/TgFV
UmfR7KYrEEgi8/0CV6CPIUS+mRsaNRHTOUtUOszXh+gbpIRSSRcUmtXLpAYUqntg
2o7SHgKlvshPHwXRKGend7BaONPFZaaKv6jrREjdLBMFJpBAMKLmMEp3RroZFOEU
2lxNrugn8wUWz9MKj/yUUgOrUefIZOkrETdxLkyOrn/dIbXKf3/CYR1uGCkBpr34
cdcDVWmBzTNZPVvQDo9SNNYTut6yeg/OLHApQgh7rnq3UYUBsmMxRwjudPdpasXR
uNs4tvchAXgGfAjZAAv1ggCRRqxw4VRZzb+5V1s50uy4wJJp+MfLiesaTrLJcN0B
Rk9lTl7m/9sLsoSbRBnMw+2M7Tm54y1fNtWAOdEbmILsOYG6HdS65f0tVvWulRu7
ZcYw4Kk2X1vbwxS8FcIVhkH/KhBI6Rz2I7AK3rTwjmOFZKDMIw5vIerTeOXG2De9
e+vANQyf4sODh5Oywy5/mXMcR0b/DVRJjja4xStTU+6wHn2XGxVqIik4W6UHRb1O
T/5x57SMYN+jAOFegmamlOIxyfMflbJcRcLYtZgO9GyR/H/Y7XMFh1cJ9Rv5GgaB
TDwwnbyRDmc82WLR5QkUM1S3+pdaJmgunvdlEfaeWNrgejZcvJsRrGRS1chA9nt/
BiYGljbJsKQ=
=3M7n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1335713477_31945P--
