[152368] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Operation Ghost Click
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (O'Reirdan, Michael)
Fri Apr 27 06:42:16 2012
From: "O'Reirdan, Michael" <Michael_OReirdan@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: Jeff Kell <jeff-kell@utc.edu>, Andrew Latham <lathama@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:41:34 +0000
In-Reply-To: <4F99FE80.6010007@utc.edu>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Please look at www.dcwg.org=0A=
=0A=
Mike=0A=
________________________________________=0A=
From: Jeff Kell [jeff-kell@utc.edu]=0A=
Sent: 26 April 2012 22:03=0A=
To: Andrew Latham=0A=
Cc: NANOG list=0A=
Subject: Re: Operation Ghost Click=0A=
=0A=
On 4/26/2012 5:44 PM, Andrew Latham wrote:=0A=
=0A=
> Yes its a major problem for the users unknowingly infected. To them=0A=
> it will look like their Internet connection is down. Expect ISPs to=0A=
> field lots of support calls.=0A=
=0A=
And what about the millions of users unknowingly infected with=0A=
"something else" ??=0A=
=0A=
These people need help, at least the "Ghost Click" victims will have a=0A=
clue after July 9, unless we opt to extend our head-in-the-sand period.=0A=
=0A=
(We have enough trouble isolating/remediating issues among our=0A=
relatively small user base, I'd hate to be facing a major ISP size=0A=
support/remediation effort...)=0A=
=0A=
Does anyone have a plan?=0A=
=0A=
Jeff=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
