[152264] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: About Juniper MX10 router performance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Md.Jahangir Hossain)
Mon Apr 23 00:48:45 2012
In-Reply-To: <CAHsqw9shfCHoZvi6eG9p8YfUA8bfzyVU1A58CUEmenCKFKx0Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:48:14 +0600
From: "Md.Jahangir Hossain" <jrjahangir@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Lassoff <jof@thejof.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thanks jonathan for your reply .
Actually i have not specific question , i need suggestion about this
product if i purchase this as IP Transit provider.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Lassoff <jof@thejof.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Md.Jahangir Hossain
> <jrjahangir@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear valued member:
> >
> >
> > Wishes all are fine.
> >
> >
> > i need suggestion from you about Juniper MX10 router performance. i
> want
> > to buy this router for IP Transit provider where i received all global
> > routes .
>
> Do you have some specific questions about it? You should be able to
> comfortably take in one to two full BGP feeds as RIBs, and hold an
> Internet-sized FIB.
>
> It's basically an MX80 (internally), but with some software
> modifications to limit its performance. You probably need to make sure
> that you're also purchasing the S-MX80-ADV-R software license in your
> base bundle (to support the full-scale L3 routing), but the licensing
> is based on the honor system.
>
> Cheers,
> jof
>
--
Thanks
---------- Jahangir*
*
