[15212] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: ISPs Blocking Private Addresses?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay R. Ashworth)
Mon Feb 9 19:24:38 1998

Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 19:11:42 -0500
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
To: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980209143657.2134B-100000@vellocet.insync.net>; from Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net> on Mon, Feb 09, 1998 at 02:42:19PM -0600

On Mon, Feb 09, 1998 at 02:42:19PM -0600, Joe Shaw wrote:
> Most people use what's commonly refered to as Martian filters to filter
> out private address spacing.  It allows those ISPs to use private address
> space internally and not have to worry about advertising them via external
> routing protocols and also keeps them from accepting bogus route
> announcements from other providers who haven't used the filters.

There's an important distinction to be made, Joe, betwen filtering
_packets_ and filtering _announcements_.  Martian filters usually
filter packets.  What you announce, and what you send, need not have
anything to do with one another.

> > Do the "default-less" ISPs filter private addresses or do they let
> > routing/forwarding do the work?
> 
> Default-less?

Yes: backbones whose routers have no default place to send packets not
handled by some explicit route.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra@baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff             Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet      "Two words: Darth Doogie."  -- Jason Colby,
Tampa Bay, Florida             on alt.fan.heinlein             +1 813 790 7592

Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post