[152077] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Wed Apr 11 17:41:58 2012
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAJAdsD=o9YbYSVqGVbwK_h+KXObPWeu2vz99ZsYjktoDcjniNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:41:17 -0400
To: PC <paul4004@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Apr 11, 2012, at 5:19 PM, PC wrote:
> He.net tunnels are also good to have because depending on your provider,
> there's still many with incomplete views of the ipv6 routing table and he
> might have a path. This is a more prevalent issue with ipv6 than v4 at the
> moment.
This is a big problem for the two providers involved in this "spat" having
inconsistent IPv4/IPv6 business relationships (peering, etc).
There are many professional service providers that will happily dual-stack
your internet port with consistent business relationships. Don't let these
two parties that so far have agreed to disagree prevent you from using IPv6
to its fullest. Select another carrier.
- Jared
