[152054] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cheap Juniper Gear for Lab
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leigh Porter)
Wed Apr 11 02:34:11 2012
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:35:32 +0000
In-Reply-To: <F9AE8448-C99A-42DD-8139-84EDAABA8AD2@delong.com>
Cc: "jgoodwin@studio442.com.au" <jgoodwin@studio442.com.au>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 11 Apr 2012, at 02:34, "Owen DeLong" <owen@delong.com> wrote:.
>=20
>> Don't let the "mpls" keyword throw you off. This actually causes the
>> box to run the inet /and/ mpls address families in packet mode.
>>=20
>=20
> I'm not unfamiliar or uninitiated in this regard. I had tickets with Jun=
iper for
> over a year and it escalated quite high up their escalation chain before=
they
> finally admitted "Yeah, Services JunOS is different and it behaves diffe=
rently
> and if you need to do what you're trying to do, you should buy an M or M=
X
> series."
>=20
> It's quite unfortunate. I'd really like for the SRX series to not be so =
crippled for
> my purposes.
Do you have an example of this crippledness?
--
Leigh
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
