|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson) To: kwe@6SigmaNets.com (Kent W. England) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 22:58:37 -0500 (EST) Cc: haas@xmission.com, nanog@merit.edu, haas@xmission.xmission.com In-Reply-To: <v02110112ac44986fc1d8@[138.112.190.3]> from "Kent W. England" at Aug 1, 95 07:04:36 pm > > This is true for non-geographic markets, but what happens when the Internet > reaches a size where geographic markets develop? > > In other words, when it makes sense to buy pizza on the Net, won't it make > sense to revive geographic naming, to serve geographic markets? > There are also organizations, such as ours, which cannot sanely aggregate traffic on a geographic measure, since a single gateway to a corporate network (which may span the globe) may be located in Duluth. We simply cannot sanely assign networks on a geographical basis. This would be farcical. CIDR'isation in this case would be on a corporate/organizational level. In this thread, no one has yet mentoned this particular issue. i realize that this has _no_ impact on domain naming, yet it is indeed an issue which has been overlooked by most providers. - paul _______________________________________________________________________________ Paul Ferguson US Sprint tel: 703.689.6828 Managed Network Engineering internet: paul@hawk.sprintmrn.com Reston, Virginia USA http://www.sprintmrn.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |