[151948] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Elijah Savage)
Fri Apr 6 10:43:56 2012
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:42:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Elijah Savage <esavage@digitalrage.org>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <A0498B1A-2E4C-40A1-8CC7-56E9A1EA578E@introspect.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thanks to all who responded off list even to those that are intrested in the opportunity, I do appreciate it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daryl G. Jurbala" <daryl@introspect.net>
To: "Elijah Savage" <esavage@digitalrage.org>
Cc: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs@seastrom.com>, "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 8:51:45 PM
Subject: Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation
I have to respond with the sentiments of Robert: "large" is a very relative term. Also, are we talking about origination or termination here? How many minutes a day of each? What's your ACD? What are your top destinations? If it's bursty like a call center how many concurrent calls?
You can't get any real answers without providing relevant information.
On Apr 5, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Elijah Savage wrote:
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> Yes an aggregator, large deployment.
>
> Initially this is discovery, though price is always important it is most about understanding operations and implementation at this point.
