[151945] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SORBS?!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Apr 6 09:49:56 2012
To: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Apr 2012 07:31:47 -0400."
<F3318834F1F89D46857972DD4B411D7005306EECCE@exchange>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:48:11 -0400
Cc: "'goemon@anime.net'" <goemon@anime.net>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1333720091_1945P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 07:31:47 -0400, Drew Weaver said:
> That's just not true, we would much rather be notified of something that a
> reputation list finds objectionable and take it down ourselves than have
> Senderbase set a poor reputation on dozens of IaaS customers.
If it was industry-wide standard practice that just notifying a provider resulted
in something being done, we'd not need things like Senderbase, which is after
all basically a list of people who don't take action when notified...
--==_Exmh_1333720091_1945P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=2egp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1333720091_1945P--
