[151939] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SORBS?!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (PC)
Thu Apr 5 14:01:57 2012
In-Reply-To: <4F7DDA3A.4080406@foobar.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:01:02 -0600
From: PC <paul4004@gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: goemon@anime.net, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
That's probably a better idea.
I moved "into" a /24 ip block that was SWIPed to me that they reported was
"dynamic cable/DSL users" (no spam history, mind you). Didn't matter, I
couldn't send e-mail.
When trying to get it delisted I had a TTL on the zone that was
"incompatible" with their standards (for DR failover purposes) and was
unwilling to maintain a TTL of how many ever hours they wanted as it didn't
fit the company's requirements.
I ended up just getting a new IP block from the ISP as they gave up on
resolving it too. Kind of a waste, but it worked. I relocated to there
instead.
1 year later they updated my ticket and delisted it.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> On 05/04/2012 17:48, goemon@anime.net wrote:
> > But they will care about a /24.
>
> I'm curious as to why they would want to stop at /24. If you're going to
> take the shotgun approach, why not blacklist the entire ASN?
>
> Nick
>
>
