[151723] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: airFiber

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phil Regnauld)
Thu Mar 29 13:31:44 2012

Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:30:33 +0000
From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@nsrc.org>
To: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com>
In-Reply-To: <F3318834F1F89D46857972DD4B411D7005306EEC00@exchange>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Drew Weaver (drew.weaver) writes:
> I've read that it requires perfect line of sight, which makes it sometimes tricky.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Drew

	Define perfect line of sight ? How is this different from any other wireless
	link and the associated Fresnel zone ?

	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_zone

	Even 100 Mbit/s wireless equipment (which ubqt also happens to make great
	gear for, at 800 USD / link) will need unobstructed view of the remote
	point - and it's not all or nothing, the performance will degrade.

	Cheers,
	Phil



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post