[151686] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lynda)
Wed Mar 28 15:00:02 2012
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:59:28 -0700
From: Lynda <shrdlu@deaddrop.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20120328185119.GB11515@hiwaay.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 3/28/2012 11:51 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Lynda<shrdlu@deaddrop.org> said:
>> This really points out one of the biggest impediments to moving to IPv6.
>> I just briefly looked at the list of registrars that are able to create
>> glue records for any domain I might have that I wanted to exist in IPv6,
>> and it's a very limited list. I'm currently using Pairnic, and I am
>> happy with them, mostly, but moving to IPv6 is painful.
> The same problem exists for DNSSEC; the number of registrars that
> support both IPv6 glue and DNSSEC in their standard interfaces is
> unfortunately small.
True story, although Pairnic makes that one easy. I just wish they'd put
up an automated interface for IPv6, but I'm happy they support it, at least.
My favorite place to look for support for both is here:
http://www.sixxs.net/faq/dns/?faq=ipv6glue
No surprise to either of us that the column for DNSSEC is filled with
yellow. :-(
--
It isn't just me.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jw_on_tech/archive/2012/03/13/why-i-left-google.aspx
