[151632] in North American Network Operators' Group
FW: Force10 E Series at the edge?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roberts, Brent)
Tue Mar 27 17:24:11 2012
From: "Roberts, Brent" <Brent.Roberts@progressive-solutions.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:21:51 +0000
In-Reply-To: <011a01cd0c5f$737a1720$5a6e4560$@wirezsound.com>
X-MAIL-FROM: <brent.roberts@progressive-solutions.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Is anyone running an E300 Series Chassis at the internet edge with multiple=
Full BGP feeds? 95th percent would be about 300 meg of traffic. BGP sessio=
n count would be between 2 and 4 Peers.
6k internal Prefix count as it stands right now. Alternative are welcome. T=
hought about the ASR1006 but I need some local switching as well.
Full requirements include
Full internet Peering over GigE Links.
Fully Redundant Power
Redundant "Supervisor/Route Processor"
Would prefer a Small Chassis unit. (under 10u)
Would also prefer a single unit as opposed to a two smaller units.
________________________________
This email and any attached files may contain confidential and/or privilege=
d material and is intended solely for the use of the person to whom it is a=
ddressed. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taki=
ng of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities o=
ther than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in err=
or, please contact the sender immediately and delete it and all attachments=
from your computer. Progressive Solutions is not liable for any errors or =
omissions in the content or transmission of this email.
