[151593] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tei)
Mon Mar 26 06:18:05 2012
In-Reply-To: <CAO1bj=ZMk=HRYFLtrO+VMb13W4kZb508LZAyw55C8T2aS0DB-w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:16:53 +0200
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 23 March 2012 13:31, Aled Morris <aledm@qix.co.uk> wrote:
> On 23 March 2012 11:53, Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org> wrote:
>
>> All three cables are being laid for the same reasons: Redundancy and spe=
ed.
>> As it stands, it takes roughly 230 milliseconds for a packet to go from
>> London to Tokyo; the new cables will reduce this by 30% to 170ms. This
>> speed-up will be gained by virtue of a much shorter run:
>
>
>
>
> If they could armor the cable sufficiently perhaps they could drill the
> straigh line path through the Earth's crust (mantle and outer core) and d=
o
> London-Tokyo in less than 10,000km.
>
> Aled
I imagine a easier solution. Use a random number generator in both
sides, with the same seed. Then use a slower way to send "packets
re-sync" that will contain the delta from the generated number, to the
real actual number.
I suppose this speeds are needed for some "fast speed transaction",
that are leeching money from the background noise on the market.
This is not like the Roman empire, where you could make a lot of money
buying wheat wen theres a dry year in egypt.
note: I could be wrong.
--=20
--
=E2=84=B1in del =E2=84=B3ensaje.
