[151589] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Sun Mar 25 16:45:22 2012
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:44:32 -0700
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Mail-Followup-To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F6F73F4.3070204@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:37:24PM -0700, JC Dill wrot=
e:
> their future is very uncertain. Can you promise that fiber has a=20
> *feasible* lifetime of 20-50 years? Maybe in 5-10 years all consumer=20
> data will be transferred via wireless, and investment in municipal wired=
=20
> data systems (fiber and copper) becomes worthless.
You have offered a two part problem.
The initial question is, will fiber put in the ground today still
be able to do something useful in 20-50 years. I believe the answer
to that is yes. There is fiber that was installed in the early
1980's that is still in use today. It's predecessor technology,
copper wires to the home, has been in use far longer and with today's
DSL technolgy has done far more than ever intended. High quality
transmission media in the ground has long life, and new, well
designed fiber would be no exception.
The second part of your question is really "might fiber be replaced
with some disruptive technology?" That is always a risk, but I
actually think the avenues for advancement are few. Wireless of
some type is probably the only viable competitor, and it's anything
but cheap at scale.
The real way to address the second part is to look at the outgoing
technology, copper/dsl. Even though phone lines were designed to
just carry 8khz voice, we've found it far cheaper and easier to
design DSL technology around those properties rather than replace
it with fiber or wireless. The reason? Build cost mostly. Diging
to bury new fiber is expensive, and even with wireless permitting
new transmitter locations and spectrum are very expensive.
Can I _guarantee_ no better technology will come along? No. However
I would posit even if it does come along the life span of fiber is
still 20 years just due to the build cost and timeframe of the new
tech. It's if it doesn't come along the timeline grows to more
like 50 years.
There's risk in any technology investment, however I think having
a high bandwidth, high reliability, cheap to operate pipe into the
home will always have enormous value, and right now fiber is the
best tech to that and thus the best place to invest.
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)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=0vuq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--
