[151442] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon, FiOS, and CLEC/UNE orders (was AT&T diversity)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Wed Mar 21 16:57:15 2012
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:56:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGVUqXVSNbvGfeKEC56+w-WzG6rmCUiC+JoMtkZTcqap3w@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
----- Original Message -----
> From: "William Herrin" <bill@her
> The hinky part is that the FCC decided that copper pairs are an
> unbundled element but PONS wavelengths and Coaxial cable frequency
> channels are not. So, Verizon doesn't have to share access to FIOS and
> Comcast doesn't have to share access to the coax.
So why is it, then, that Vision Cable-Bright House-Advance/Newhouse Cable
Partnership (which is what the payroll checks have said since about 1979)
*is* required to provide competitive cablemodem access on their HFC plant?
(I can get RoadRunner, their own brand, or Earthlink, or the local provider
Internet Junction...)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
