[151440] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon, FiOS, and CLEC/UNE orders (was AT&T diversity)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Mar 21 16:13:58 2012
To: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:00:32 -0400."
<13694695.7491.1332360032081.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:12:24 -0400
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1332360744_2002P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:00:32 -0400, Jay Ashworth said:
> Someone tells me off list that indeed, if the plant isn't *there*, VZN
> isn't required to build it.
>
> Now, if that's the case, then they can't adminstratively block *someone
> else* from building it, either...
Yes, but it's assymetric. VZN isn't required to build the 150 foot of
copper plant from building to pole, and they can't stop a competitor
from building 12,000 foot of copper plant from PoP to building. ;)
--==_Exmh_1332360744_2002P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iQIVAwUBT2o2KAdmEQWDXROgAQJIyg//Q9w0CB7xrzICy+KhU7FQOzipT3M4a7lK
tUMFOZttY0GGwTygMHIfIwaP/VYL8Ne4LJvQfjeReadYh/w2YCX7R9hd2nUbKNHE
8b7X6EyquOecLPfGsz/yptm1dT61kUVzdpNeNqOjocBm63qAhs0fEq3t8oPky4nR
Zz0VGfzNlaF3B9oiQEXmYhVws4cW+swzVBUVLkvNMSYUjxzBK/0NOhZA6VV9t0nR
rgUhIy6ad3AJMfBQHP0TVoZhJuYlr49TLWNnErH0SwAzoWWkuRzQOP3kEdfJwG2+
p5ziDSyA8QEhm7gfUVGlqIZx4nym/nUf6BYYHJyqHDXPRZvd8V293eGVBGXWFD2K
cbB1fcitzUB4k1MEV5V14KKNPUJVddlDfINnRRhebnglqS7D3oDgmmS+s/vZnWc7
rkZ1lCuStEQNjIDcMkstXvepe8bHvyUtATfn2MGRs60cq3TSFYHhCg6UBw9g80/U
A4PftuDnJ5ZvCutMUL9wbE493GC3SQ5hws9GTf6lbAgigGNZJqDFmWsgWnuSJAAL
aZCzKz1oVVmBwcJICHFIBl9zZjv1z7CnBi6Bn5iqcbFNDsQeDuCN6zjX4IFrDg50
Bjlz7b27xIpXkWu0Rp2Q3LZ7F6HRvKbPadB/Bz8tETA1Jrp/Hcpm9dba25uZWc30
VyD50nK6KGY=
=OT7y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1332360744_2002P--
