[151369] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: shared address space... a reality!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Mar 16 17:48:28 2012
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:17:38 PDT."
<62BECEF4-68A0-4E44-9E5D-87CD42531037@delong.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:44:46 -0400
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1331934286_2004P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:17:38 PDT, Owen DeLong said:
> It may be easy to sell, but it's also fictitious.
>
> NAT is antithetical to security, not beneficial to it.
Anybody want to hazard a guess what % of Vint Cerf's famous 140M compromised
boxes were behind a NAT and still got pwned by a drive-by fruiting?
--==_Exmh_1331934286_2004P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=e0RP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1331934286_2004P--
