[151348] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Anyone have experience with Adconion Direct?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Keymer)
Fri Mar 16 13:46:05 2012
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:44:19 -0700
From: Mark Keymer <mark@viviotech.net>
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAArzuouFvJXMOZjrCVBTybDYuVAbU5_375SG6G6JX_RU=C90ag@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi,
I guess I should clarify a bit more on my comments about ROKSO at Spamhaus.
Spamhaus says here http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/section/ROKSO%20FAQ#159
that people that have been thrown off 3 ISP due to spamming or providing
spam services get on the ROKSO. So I tried to contact them to see what
the process was for reporting that. If someone here knows how to do that
and would like to share that would be great.
I do agree that to get delisted in the RBL etc they are responsive.
Also per my main point I wanted to thank those of you that got back with
me about Adconion Direct.
Sincerely,
Mark
On 3/16/2012 2:51 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> If a company has a ROKSO record, you don't want to host them. And
> spamhaus IS responsive.
>
> Yes they don't take spam reports from people - they got their own
> traps. They ARE responsive to requests for removal where the request
> checks out and meets their criteria.
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Mark Keymer <mark@viviotech.net
> <mailto:mark@viviotech.net>> wrote:
>
>
> Also along the lines of spammers and or similar activities is
> there a good resource for looking up people/companies that might
> be not so legit? I know of the ROKSO that spamhaus has but from
> what I have seen it is hard to even report spammer to them and
> wasn't sure how active that was getting updated these days.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com <mailto:ops.lists@gmail.com>)
