[151339] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: shared address space... a reality!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Chown)
Fri Mar 16 03:19:45 2012
In-Reply-To: <244371.1331845426@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:18:14 +0000
To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 15 Mar 2012, at 21:03, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:35:13 PDT, George Herbert said:
>> What, senior network people testing out new test/transitional space at
>> home before they test it at work is bad?
>=20
> Either that, or Randy was being snarky about how long the promise to *only=
* use
> the address space for numbering CGN interfaces and not as additional RFC19=
18
> space was going to last in reality....
So where is that new /10 leaking to already? ;).
Tim=
