[151325] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Mar 15 20:10:03 2012
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:31:07 +0900."
<4F627BBB.6020003@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:08:37 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1331856517_2149P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:31:07 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
> Here is an exercise for you insisting on DNS, an intermediate
> system.
>
> What if DNS servers, including root ones, are mobile?
So, is this question more like:
What if computers worked in trinary?
or
What if people show criminal negligence in misdesigning their networks?
You're asking a "what if" for a usage case that nobody sane has suggested.
--==_Exmh_1331856517_2149P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iQIVAwUBT2KEhQdmEQWDXROgAQK0MBAAoKuFVlV6kkW4NMOo1leMkhDeE3Zg0L7E
XCQe8JCv5PEkXAq+a42HILqq0lfug4SaKWx+XF2h9ZhBMUwoHKymL6dha7wyFsa2
vislG9k+I82xzdPjgNxzx3US9VLvknkAZnb5rAO9XyL2zbOlBRHQt9vKHHPgYUsr
5gacgb+U6Cv6Srswc3kFqFrSrwxYhynGzaBXzp2W5w8dPTdv60mg6OEJK/SQVvzd
WRTCwbXsKF/6argFIC7xPYF4jh90AnSZtHSmcSNF8jgkTf6CV9k9WDAsfTQsejKE
Pn1bRw5GEivukubnN3sudgEmJAkyzWvu+8TCkRE/B0QXaAPRsCl34kC4OathGj6E
AKPw+r9t5KJyngVgxaaQSSWShestspOX99nn117kABXuqeTQ3UNzjJgGVbhRTkEm
cR36m1FbIEG1EqoyBUQekexftUe5QRj/bzVjEzhQ58olufe3NJZ79KzFG/CWaORh
l+DLzmvqAHl1eJuLsJ3uLqwTwqA81oeNRKuca85GDFIplMfaUCbxP7Y8z8+1VDEF
aHc2zZAPyMud1p2VmtWXqHJNmiOVoP/kXyA5yKb3KqZZFlUKEOLXn70zUI4oYo8C
cADmcNy3iyLHy9B4PKxUyCuE+hPzAnQB3tE2P8AjLxEoW8JyRbhdpsE85hxNRyd9
ibVDhYkHmqc=
=tsNJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1331856517_2149P--
