[151322] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Thu Mar 15 18:58:56 2012
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:56:09 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20120315135825.GJ9891@leitl.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Eugen Leitl wrote:
>> So, I should ask what prevents you from using it with IPv4?
>
> Because IPv4 will be legacy by the time something like this lands,
Maybe. But, IPv6 will be so before IPv4 (or, is already IMHO).
> and because IPv6 needs more bits/route so more pain there.
Feel free to propose filter everything beyond /32 and get
accepted by the community.
Masataka Ohta
