[151298] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: shared address space... a reality!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Thu Mar 15 09:05:37 2012

Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:02:38 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <C42FE1A6-7742-4466-85AF-8F23694C39D9@firsthand.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Christian de Larrinaga wrote:

> ;-) So that is what  "very rough consensus" looks like operationally!
> IESG Note
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg09959.html

Instead, I wonder whether the last phrases of the note, "the IETF
remain committed to the deployment of IPv6" is the consensus,
however rough, or not.

It might be so, if people silently ignoring IPv6 are not counted.

						Masataka Ohta


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post