[151257] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon FiOS - is BGP an option?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Faisal Imtiaz)
Wed Mar 14 09:13:10 2012
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:11:10 -0400
From: Faisal Imtiaz <faisal@snappydsl.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaaX8EGFQuuNdkjXO226bRD5W1KzmG8nfqAJEBf+PKDhdw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Faisal@snappydsl.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
in the DSL world, when we were providing service using Bridge PVC's, it
was easier to allocate (as many needed) /32 to a customer CPE, than to
route a subnet.
This changed when the AT&T/BellSouth infrastructure changed from being
able to get ATM PVC's to PPPoE only network.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet& Telecom
On 3/13/2012 11:57 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Owen DeLong<owen@delong.com> wrote:
>>> C) 5 ips STATICALLY ROUTED AS /32's!! (WTF??) for 25$ above the
>>> option-B above/month.
>>>
>> And people wonder why Verizon is the first to whine about routing table growth from deaggregation? ;-)
>>
> eh, these end up (I think) aggregated on the edge router, so you get 5
> /32's from a /23 (or the like) routed to the edge layer3 device. not
> as bloaty for the rest of their network as it at first seems.
>
>> In all seriousness, though, I don't think they are routed as /32s. I think that's one for the Verizon CPE,
>> 5 for your devices all routed as a single /29.
>>
> owen, seen the config on a live router, yes they are routed as /32's
> to the VC you are connected to. I probably have the config for my old
> link in IM/email somewhere. apparently their automation either doesn't
> understand CIDR, or it was 'too expensive' to make the automation do
> CIDR once they started to offer extra ips to the business customers.
>
> -chris
>
>
