[151202] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Mar 13 15:24:23 2012

From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGWmOD_1yDgBQazjj0pwj20+-+4KxG=QWaNKp+FC8RCDJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:20:23 -0700
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

It's _WAY_ more than a billion boxes at this point.

Owen

On Mar 13, 2012, at 10:27 AM, William Herrin wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> wrote:
>> I'm hard pressed in my head to rationalize how maintaining software for
>> the next 50 years on a few billion or so boxes is cheaper in the global
>> sense than adding memory to perhaps half a million routers.
> 
> For a one-order of magnitude increase in "routes," (upper bound of
> $30B/year the BGP way) it may or may not be. For a four orders
> increase ($30T/year) it's self-evidently cheaper to change software on
> the billion or so boxes. How many "routes" would a system improvement
> that radically reduced the cost per route add?
> 
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
> 
> 
> -- 
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com  bill@herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post