[151156] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Mon Mar 12 17:16:27 2012
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGVBm51DbDvZGxBXDwgpBbrGdOqp2N3JNcTejO3H7b3Bzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:14:00 +0100
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 12 Mar 2012, at 21:15 , William Herrin wrote:
> Not at all. You just build a second tier to the routing system.
It's so strange how people think a locator/identifier split will solve =
the scalability problem. We already have two tiers: DNS names and IP =
addresses. So that didn't solve anything. I don't see any reason a =
second second tier would.=
