[151128] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Mar 12 13:13:07 2012
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F5E14ED.8050808@dds.nl>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:09:20 -0700
To: Seth Mos <seth.mos@dds.nl>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mar 12, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
> On 12-3-2012 16:07, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>>=20
>> Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> writes:
>>=20
>=20
>> Grass-roots, bottom-up policy process
>> +
>> Need for multihoming
>> +
>> Got tired of waiting
>> =3D
>> IPv6 PI
>=20
> +
> Cheap End Users
> =3D
> IPv6 NPt (IPv6 Prefix Translation)
>=20
> Cheers,
>=20
> Seth
I don't get the association between cheap end users and NPT. Can you =
explain how one relates to the other, given the added costs of =
unnecessarily translating prefixes?
Owen
