[151066] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Concern about gTLD servers in India
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Brunner-Williams)
Sat Mar 10 17:06:56 2012
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:05:50 -0500
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHsqw9sxxGT_ATgxOO_S2iefZAioAKHre-UpPUqbgnLevZVKzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 3/10/12 3:23 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> I would presume that Verisign decided that it just wasn't worth the
> effort to deploy into India.
operational control of .in passed to a for-profit operator domiciled
in one_of{us,ca,ie} other than VGRS. as india is a competitor's
property, investment there by VGRS mby be difficult to justify.
-e
