[151059] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Concern about gTLD servers in India
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel jaeggli)
Sat Mar 10 13:01:45 2012
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:00:36 -0800
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAArzuostcxXb6yiyRRnPu_EU272hpbKa5Ha-Bq9CJOReoA37ag@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 3/10/12 08:05 , Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Sure, if you can find a datacenter that's capable of handling all the
> traffic, and has staff who are able to provide efficient remote hands for
> huge racks of extremely powerful servers .. and are possibly also open to
> cross subsidizing the costs that GTLD operators will incur to host
> instances of their servers in India .. etc etc.
DNS even at scale is not a particularly compute intensive service.
That said whether it's worth it or not is in the eyes of operator.
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com> wrote:
>
>> Please don't create confusions.
>>
>> I didn't made any assertion. I mentioned issue with India, but Graham came
>> with point that issue is similar in Africa. Good point if he knows that.
>> Certainly relevent to issue I mentioned for India.
>>
>
>
>
